![]() The Burning Bush M. Begnal 3 Newcastle Road Galway Ireland ISSN 1393-8312 email The Burning Bush visit the editor's blog #11 was the final issue. ![]() Web design by This page last updated: 14th December 2007. |
The Burning Bush #5 | |
|
This well produced magazine has a substantial content of poetry and prose, essays and reviews. The editorial by Michael S. Begnal (which tells us also that this is the first issue he has edited alone) is concerned with the relation between the art of poetry and the poetry of politics, and concludes with an excellent paragraph discussing the form and the content of a poem (or the How and the What, as Begnal calls them) which contains sound and wise advice for any aspiring poet. Begnal also discusses, in an illuminating review of the poets published by the Wild Honey Press, another relation, that between the mainstream tradition of Irish poetry (which became in the last century, "the Yates-Kavanagh-Heaney axis") and the alternative experimental or avant-garde, to the encouragement of which THE BURNING BUSH is devoted. However, if there is one influence noticeable in this issue, it is the Beats. Thus Corso (died 2001) is commemorated on the back cover, and John Thomas Menesini has a short essay linking the Celtic oral tradition with Kerouac (and further, with hip-hop). Not that the Mainstream tradition is absent; in fact Begnal's two traditions are combined in one poet, John W. Sexton, who contributes a Ginsbergian PRAYER TO ALLEN GINSBERG as well as THE WILLOWED GROVE, a Yatesian ballad complete with irregular rhythm and half-rhymes, though not, in my view, quite the Yatesian tone:
I went down to the willowed grove,
where the river troubles itself with stones,
and met a woman made of shadow
making herself a coat of thorns.
But Begnal pushes the Beat connection further in an excellent and
informative review of James Liddy's latest look of poetry. Liddy
himself then takes over with his second piece on JACK KEROUAC AND THE
IRISH CONNECTION, which eclectically manages to include not just
Kerouac, Ginsberg et al, not just Patrick Kavanagh, but even Oscar Wilde
under the same heading.
Isn't this going too far? However much one might speculate on Wilde, Kerouac and Catholicism, and on whether the shared "addiction to ritual, church theatre, and Latinity accounted for the poetic, myth-making quality of both writers' prose," one might also notice quite a few differences between them. (The cynical formality of Wilde's writing, for example.) One might also respond cynically to this dependence on the Beats as a foundation for THE BURNING BUSH: "Experimental? Avant-garde? The Beats are SO twentieth-century!" And perhaps even earlier than that. Begnal, in his review of Liddy, draws our attention to the similarity of form between some lines of Liddy and some by the "less-famous" Beat poet, Bob Kaufman. But one might just as well point out the similarity of both to the Daddy of all incantatory poets, Walt Whitman. Besides, Liddy writes plenty of poems which are not noticeably Beat-influenced at all. His perspectives and his skills are wide. As well as critical writing, this issue contains two stories by Sam Millar and Kevin Doyle, which I found unpleasant and very unpleasant, respectively. Fortunately I enjoyed the poetry contributions almost without exception. They start with three excellent poems by the Cuban-American Virgil Suarez, and continue with thoughtful, deep, witty or exciting poems by poets from around the world. Most are "free form," though hardly experimental these days. A Manx poem by Bob Carswell is helpfully translated into Irish, seeing that few readers of the magazine will understand Manx. Just to be fair, the Welsh poem by Robert Lacey is self-translated into English. Kieran Furey's ACCOUNT OF LODGER WITHDRAWING AFTER MAKING DEPOSIT begins
Condemned for her Eveish sin
Daniella in the lines' din
Between local stations of the cross
Town variety commuting her sentence . . .
and amusingly continues the themed puns for another 22 lines.
I certainly found a great deal to enjoy, to contemplate, and to respond to in THE BURNING BUSH. An impressive, stimulating magazine. | ||
| reviewer: Andrew Belsey. | ||
| The Burning Bush #8 | ||
|
The issue opens with the editorial statement: The Burning Bush has been a failure. Having set out to promote "underground" and "experimentalism" (as I actually wrote in the first issue), the magazine did initially manage to garner some attention, probably more than expected. It soon became apparent, however, that the Revolution of the Word was not suddenly going to materialise in Ireland. Nor were the big-time publishers and critics suddenly going to swing into line behind it.This is not a situation peculiar to Ireland. The launch of a publication is always news; its continued publication is not — so the not-so-interested media ignore it. Issue #8 of a small press magazine is always pivotal. The enthusiasm of launch has abated and the routines of publishing take over. No wonder this sounds the death-knell of many. Begnal, though, does not appear to be giving up. Neither does he concoct a conspiracy theory about being excluded like Andy Jordan, editor of 10th Muse. He sides with Michael Smith who wrote in Poetry Ireland Whereas the modern visual arts years ago achieved their revolution, or evolution, into modernity, gradually winning over a relatively mass public that could appreciate such works without turning its back on the past, modern poetry has not achieved a similar success at least here and generally in Britain.The creative writing class is credited with a lot of the blame for this state of affairs. The issue has a healthy number of poems, including the three-page CODA by Maurice Scully which begins: Hey-you! goes the train on the line setting & abetting clack-at-a-click turning on its stern the Then & the FarThere are some poems and a short prose piece in Irish; other prose in English and two extracts from novels-in-progress. The editor interviews James Liddy over a drink and the talk centres mainly on Kavanagh, Kerouac, Baudelaire and spontaneity in Irish poetry. The issue rounds off with a generous helping of reviews. There is a lot of smoke emanating from the Burning Bush — its flames may not be roaring but they are smouldering gently and don't look like dying out for a good time yet. | ||
| reviewer: Martin Grampound. | ||
| The Burning Bush #9 | ||
|
An Irish magazine THE BURNING BUSH provides a good mix of poetry, prose and reviews. A strong sense of national identity sits comfortably alongside work from a range of international writers. This issue opens strongly with Gearóid Mac Lochlainn's poem LON DUBH LOCH LAO in Gaelic and English; I enjoyed its density of images, objects and descriptions: Streets hummed with om and tones of barter: guineas, shillings, ducats, crowns, florins, euros, dollar. Everything was up for grabs and anything could be bought: from needles to anchors, keys, kegs and garters, harpoons, tin fiddles, flutes, lathes and leather, the manuscripts of Pádraic Fiacc laced with blades, buckshot, loose cannons, guillotines and gallows.I was haunted by the two poems by the late Richard Caddell: I sit here as light goes, thinking of you crossing mountains at night — stars so close and bright you could've touched them.from NOCTURNE IN BLACK AND WHITE for Lucy. Nina Quigley's DOLLY haunted me in a different way; it opens Dolly lies dashed on the back door step.The second stanza reveals the rank plastic smell of her opens up a memory box deep in your head, but stiff fingers resist your cheek's longing to cherish, the kissing better of your lips.If the poetry wasn't already enough to tempt you, this issue is worth buying alone for David Butler's MANIFESTO against what he terms the Heaney effect in Irish poetry, Eurovision and Museum principles. THE BURNING BUSH engages the reader both with quality poetry and thought-provoking reviews and essays on contemporary literature. While of particular pertinence to those interested in Irish literature, it also sweeps its net wider and presents some good catches. | ||
| reviewer: L. Kiew. | ||
| The Burning Bush #10 | ||
|
Steadily growing in strength and reputation, and challenging (perhaps unconsciously) to become Ireland's most evocative small press mag. This issue is a mixture of Irish and American poets with a couple of UKers. There's a good long poem BERRYMAN IN PARIS (In 1953 with his first wife Eileen, or in 1967? This isn't made clear) by Todd Swift; Higgins, Tyler-Bennett, Alan Jude Moore, Supranowicz. A few Gaelic poems too. The reviews by the editor and half a dozen others are well written and edifying. Recommended. Send cheques to the industrious editor. | ||
| reviewer: Eddie Harriman. | ||
| The Burning Bush #11 | ||
|
This is the final issue of The Burning Bush. The editor says I've just reached a point where I feel, at least for the moment, that it ought not to be me who publishes it. Editing and publishing a literary magazine takes a great deal of energy and enthusiasm. Paradoxically, to do so slowly saps that same energy and enthusiasm. It is a struggle (for all the usual reasons one might imagine). It can also divert one's creativity away from one's own work.There is some good poetry in this departing issue including work by David Butler, David Winwood and Maurice Scully, a brief tribute to Djuna Barnes, translated work and a gradely selection of reviews. One thing, I'm sure of, we won't have heard the last of Michael S. Begnal — he's an Irish tiger — according to my spell-checker which keeps trying to change his name to Bengal! | ||
| reviewer: Gerald England. |